What happens if I breach a loan covenant?

Contractually, a breach is usually an event of default that entitles the bank to serious remedies — repricing, stopping further drawdowns, even demanding repayment. Practically, what happens first is a conversation, and its tone depends heavily on who started it. A breach the borrower flagged early, with a cause and a plan, most commonly resolves as a waiver or a covenant reset, sometimes with a fee. A breach the bank discovered, after silence, starts from suspicion and often ends with tighter terms and closer monitoring. The formal remedies exist as the bank's fallback; candour is what determines whether they stay theoretical.

Can loan covenants be negotiated?

Yes — at origination and again at each annual review, and the definitions deserve as much attention as the numbers. A debt-service covenant's practical bite depends entirely on how earnings and debt service are defined: whether one-off items are excluded, whether the test looks back twelve months or annualises a quarter, whether a temporary equity injection can cure a miss. Borrowers argue over the ratio and sign whatever definition is printed; desks know the definition is where the covenant actually lives. The other negotiable is headroom — the gap between expected performance and the trigger level — which should be set against your realistic bad year, not your budget.

What is covenant headroom and how much should I have?

Headroom is the distance between where the covenant is set and where your numbers are expected to run — the size of the bad year you can absorb before a technical breach. There is no universal correct amount: a stable business can run tighter headroom safely, a cyclical one cannot, and the honest calibration is against your worst recent year rather than your forecast. What matters as much as the amount is the trajectory: covenant results trending toward the line, quarter after quarter, are information the bank is reading whether or not you mention them — and mentioning them first is the cheapest credibility a borrower can buy.

What are information undertakings on a facility?

The covenants about telling rather than performing: management accounts monthly or quarterly, compliance certificates, audited statements annually, and notification obligations for material events. They are the easiest covenants to breach through simple neglect, and desks read them as a management-quality signal precisely because they are so controllable — a business that cannot deliver its own numbers on time is telling the bank something no ratio captures. The practical rule is unglamorous: treat reporting deadlines as real deadlines, and if the accounts will be late, say so before the date, not after it.

Why does my facility have a clean-down covenant?

Because a working capital facility is meant to revolve, and the clean-down is how the bank verifies it does. The covenant requires the balance to return to zero, or a stated low point, for a continuous period each year — evidence that the facility is funding a genuine trading cycle rather than becoming permanent debt in disguise. A business that cannot clean down has not failed a formality; it has demonstrated that part of its borrowing is core, and the constructive response is restructuring that part onto term debt built for permanence, which is usually cheaper as well as more honest.

What is a reservation of rights letter from a bank?

A letter the bank sends after a covenant breach to say that it has noticed, that it is not waiving the breach, and that it is keeping every option the facility gives it open while it decides what to do. It changes nothing on the day — the facility keeps running — but it prevents the bank from being taken to have accepted the breach simply by continuing to lend. It usually arrives when the bank found the problem before the borrower raised it, and it is often the point at which the file moves onto a watch list and to a different reader. The right response is the pack you should have sent before the certificate: the cause, the numbers, and the plan.

// FOR BORROWERSTHE DEAL INSIDE THE DEAL

Loan Covenants, Explained

Thermometers, not tripwires — and the definitions matter more than the numbers everyone argues about.

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED 2026-10-11

// THE SHORT ANSWER

A loan covenant is a promise written into a facility so the bank sees trouble early and can act before it becomes a loss. The common set on commercial facilities is small: serviceability (debt service cover, or interest cover where no principal is scheduled), leverage, the clean-down on a working capital line, the information undertakings about telling, and a behavioural set — negative pledge, limits on distributions, change of control. The real negotiation is rarely the ratio; it is the headroom above it and the definitions underneath it. This page sets out the common set, headroom, what happens at a breach, and living with them well.

BASIS Practitioner judgment from sixteen years in commercial banking, set out in How Bankers Think (Highbank Press, 2026). Every borrower on this site is a composite constructed for teaching, not a client. The market is mid-market commercial lending as practised in New Zealand and Australia; where a convention differs elsewhere, the page says so.

// MAKE THE CALL

Issue 07 — Coastline Retail Group. NPAT up 9%. Operating cash flow down 31%. The dividend consent request is on your desk. Your call first, then the senior banker's.

Read the file →

// 01 — WHAT COVENANTS ARE FOR

Covenants are the running terms of a facility — promises about how the business will perform and behave between now and repayment. Borrowers tend to read them as tripwires set to catch a fall. Desks design them as thermometers: a covenant trending toward its limit is information months before it is a breach, and the whole apparatus exists to force a conversation while options still exist — waivers, resets, restructures — rather than after they have gone. A facility with no covenants is not a kindness; it is a lender who will learn about your trouble at the same time you run out of it.

This page covers the common set on commercial facilities, why headroom and definitions are the real negotiation, and what actually happens on a breach. The institutional machinery reading your covenant certificates is described in How Banks Manage Credit Risk.

// 02 — THE COMMON SET

Serviceability: debt service cover on amortising loans — earnings against scheduled principal and interest — and interest cover where no principal is scheduled. Leverage: total debt against earnings, capping how much obligation the business carries per dollar it generates. The clean-down on working capital lines — the revolving facility's truth test. Information undertakings: the covenants about telling — accounts on time, certificates each quarter, material events notified. And the behavioural set: negative pledges (no new security to others), restrictions on distributions when performance is tight, change-of-control provisions. Each maps to a specific fear; a covenant you cannot see the fear behind is worth asking your banker to explain, because they can.

// 03 — HEADROOM AND DEFINITIONS: THE REAL NEGOTIATION

Two things determine whether a covenant package is livable, and neither is the headline ratio. Headroom — the gap between the trigger and your expected performance — should be calibrated against your realistic bad year, not your budget: a covenant that only works if the forecast lands is a breach on a timer. Cyclical businesses need more of it than stable ones, and a desk that sets covenants off your best year has built the file a problem both sides will meet later. Definitions — what counts as earnings, what counts as debt service, whether one-offs are excluded, how the test period works — are where a covenant actually lives. Borrowers argue the number and sign the printed definition; the professionals read the definition first, because a 1.5× covenant with a harsh definition is tighter than a 1.25× with a fair one.

// 04 — WHEN A COVENANT BREAKS

The formal position: a breach is typically an event of default, giving the bank rights up to and including demand. The practical sequence is almost always softer and almost entirely shaped by who raised it first. Flagged early by the borrower — with the cause named and a plan attached — the standard outcomes are a waiver for the period, a reset to realistic levels, occasionally a fee, and closer monitoring for a time. Discovered by the bank after silence, the same numbers produce reservation-of-rights letters, tightened terms, and a file moved to closer management. The asymmetry is not personality; it is information economics. A borrower who self-reports has demonstrated their reporting works and their candour holds under pressure — the two things a worried lender most needs to believe.

// 05 — WHAT HAPPENS INSIDE THE BANK AFTER A BREACH

The sequence is more orderly than borrowers imagine, and it is worth knowing where each step sits. The breach is flagged at the compliance certificate — or by the bank's own test, if the certificate is late, which is itself a breach of the information undertakings. The banker raises it with credit. Credit has three choices: waive it for the period, amend the level to one the business can meet, or reserve rights — a letter that says the bank has noticed, is not waiving, and is keeping every option open while it decides. A reservation of rights changes nothing on the day; it prevents the bank from being taken to have accepted the breach by continuing to lend.

What moves next is the file's grade. A breach usually takes the exposure onto a watch list, or into a criticised grade, which means a different reader, a shorter review cycle and a provision the bank now has to hold. The step after that — transfer to a workout or special assets team — is the bank concluding that the relationship banker's optimism has become part of the risk. Most breaches never get there. The ones that do are the ones where the bank heard about the problem last.

A waiver is not free. Expect a fee, sometimes a margin step-up, reporting that arrives more often, and the covenant reset to a level with real headroom — which is the useful part. A technical breach, such as a late certificate, is treated as a reporting failure; a financial breach, a ratio missed, is treated as evidence about the business. And a file does come back: on evidence, over quarters, and usually to a different reader than the one who first raised it.

// 06 — LIVING WITH THEM WELL

The working habits that make covenants a non-event: test yourself quarterly before the bank does, on the bank's definitions, so the certificate never surprises you; watch the trend, not just the pass — three quarters of narrowing headroom is a conversation to start now; use the annual review to reset covenants the business has outgrown, in either direction; and when a miss is coming, call it before the test date. Covenants punish exactly one strategy reliably, and it is silence.

// STANDARDS THIS SITS BESIDE

The recognised ground this page sits beside. Each was opened and checked when cited; none is a source for the framework itself.

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Prudential Practice Guide APG 220 Credit Risk Management (current from 1 January 2022) — paragraph 43 — Covenants are an important tool for limiting a lender's exposure to changes in a borrower's risk; they should be set at a level that mitigates it, fit the laws and banking codes that apply, and be tracked over time — the early-warning reading in section 01.
Australian Banking Association, Banking Code of Practice (2025) — paragraphs 87–91 and the definition of Small Business — For a small business as the code defines it — under A$10m turnover, fewer than 100 full-time staff and under A$5m total debt, a subscribing bank acts on a default other than non-payment only from a closed list and only where it is material, and a financial-ratio covenant is a trigger only on property-development and specialised loans — the limit on section 04's formal position in that market.
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Prudential Standard APS 220 Credit Risk Management (in force 1 January 2023) — paragraph 62(a) — A bank's credit administration must monitor documentation, contractual requirements, covenants and collateral — the machinery inside the bank in section 05.

// QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK

What happens if I breach a loan covenant?: Contractually, a breach is usually an event of default that entitles the bank to serious remedies — repricing, stopping further drawdowns, even demanding repayment. Practically, what happens first is a conversation, and its tone depends heavily on who started it. A breach the borrower flagged early, with a cause and a plan, most commonly resolves as a waiver or a covenant reset, sometimes with a fee. A breach the bank discovered, after silence, starts from suspicion and often ends with tighter terms and closer monitoring. The formal remedies exist as the bank's fallback; candour is what determines whether they stay theoretical.
Can loan covenants be negotiated?: Yes — at origination and again at each annual review, and the definitions deserve as much attention as the numbers. A debt-service covenant's practical bite depends entirely on how earnings and debt service are defined: whether one-off items are excluded, whether the test looks back twelve months or annualises a quarter, whether a temporary equity injection can cure a miss. Borrowers argue over the ratio and sign whatever definition is printed; desks know the definition is where the covenant actually lives. The other negotiable is headroom — the gap between expected performance and the trigger level — which should be set against your realistic bad year, not your budget.
What is covenant headroom and how much should I have?: Headroom is the distance between where the covenant is set and where your numbers are expected to run — the size of the bad year you can absorb before a technical breach. There is no universal correct amount: a stable business can run tighter headroom safely, a cyclical one cannot, and the honest calibration is against your worst recent year rather than your forecast. What matters as much as the amount is the trajectory: covenant results trending toward the line, quarter after quarter, are information the bank is reading whether or not you mention them — and mentioning them first is the cheapest credibility a borrower can buy.
What are information undertakings on a facility?: The covenants about telling rather than performing: management accounts monthly or quarterly, compliance certificates, audited statements annually, and notification obligations for material events. They are the easiest covenants to breach through simple neglect, and desks read them as a management-quality signal precisely because they are so controllable — a business that cannot deliver its own numbers on time is telling the bank something no ratio captures. The practical rule is unglamorous: treat reporting deadlines as real deadlines, and if the accounts will be late, say so before the date, not after it.
Why does my facility have a clean-down covenant?: Because a working capital facility is meant to revolve, and the clean-down is how the bank verifies it does. The covenant requires the balance to return to zero, or a stated low point, for a continuous period each year — evidence that the facility is funding a genuine trading cycle rather than becoming permanent debt in disguise. A business that cannot clean down has not failed a formality; it has demonstrated that part of its borrowing is core, and the constructive response is restructuring that part onto term debt built for permanence, which is usually cheaper as well as more honest.
What is a reservation of rights letter from a bank?: A letter the bank sends after a covenant breach to say that it has noticed, that it is not waiving the breach, and that it is keeping every option the facility gives it open while it decides what to do. It changes nothing on the day — the facility keeps running — but it prevents the bank from being taken to have accepted the breach simply by continuing to lend. It usually arrives when the bank found the problem before the borrower raised it, and it is often the point at which the file moves onto a watch list and to a different reader. The right response is the pack you should have sent before the certificate: the cause, the numbers, and the plan.

// THE VOCABULARY, DESK-DEFINED

Every covenant term on this page — debt service cover, interest cover, clean-down, covenant headroom — is defined the way a credit desk uses it in the glossary, each with its own anchor and the places this site works it.

Open the glossary →

THE IN-TRAY · ONE MINUTE