Skip to content

Corrections

Every correction made to a published page, newest first: the page, the date it went live, what was wrong, and what the page says now. A site about reading numbers honestly has to keep its own record in public.

// THE RULE

A correction is made on the page itself and moves the page's last-updated date, which is printed on every case and every guide. It is then listed here, and the row is never edited afterwards except to fix its own error, which gets a row of its own. Dates are the day the corrected page went live.

What belongs here is a figure, a name or a reading that was wrong. What does not: a change of presentation — a currency, a renamed section, a redrawn picture — new material added to a page, or a composite case revised to match a real business, which never happens, because none describes one.

// THE LOG

  1. 2026-09-25

    Issue 01 — Pacific Premium Foods

    WAS
    The senior read gave the healthy cycle's inventory days as 50, and said the facility had absorbed about US$3.4m beyond growth, under half of the increase.
    NOW
    The arithmetic the read rests on uses 30 days (40 + 30 − 35 = 35 days on US$42m of revenue), which is what returns the healthy need to the US$3.5–4.5m the page states. The amount absorbed beyond growth is about US$5.3m, and the requested increase covers less than a third of it. The founder's chair and the app's content were corrected the same day.
  2. 2026-09-25

    How It Works

    WAS
    Said that the tools' results are not stored. For a signed-in member that was not true.
    NOW
    A member's record keeps the calculator's verdict and the quiz's five answers, and never the figures typed into either calculator. The page now says so.
  3. 2026-09-25

    How It Works, the Book, About, the Highbank Universe

    WAS
    Five statements had drifted from what the site actually holds: a drill takes 'seven minutes' to read; the book's frameworks are worked in 'three' product files; the site has two tools; there are three kinds of reader; Highbank's borrowers 'come back'.
    NOW
    A drill is designed to be read in about six minutes. Four product files work the frameworks. There are three tools, the Five-Step Read among them. Four kinds of reader, one per door. Highbank's borrowers can come back — some do not.
  4. 2026-09-04

    Issue 07 — Coastline Retail Group

    WAS
    Cash conversion was shown as 62%, from 118% the year before, and the reading said underlying profit was down roughly 20%. Those were derived figures, and they did not follow from the NPAT and operating cash flow the page states.
    NOW
    Conversion is 83% (US$11.8m of operating cash flow against US$14.2m of NPAT), from 131% the year before, and underlying profit is down roughly a third. Corrected on the page, in the current-issue strip on the home page, in the newsletter copy and in the app's content. The issue's letter had already reached its readers with the earlier figures.

// TO REPORT ONE

If a figure, a name or a reading is wrong, write to hello@bankingjudgmentlab.com with the page and the line. Anything that turns out to be wrong is fixed on the page and added above, with the date. How the Cases Are Made describes the checks a case goes through before it is published, which is where most errors are meant to be caught.