Skip to content

How the Cases Are Made

Every case on this site is built the same way, checked the same way, and corrected the same way. This page says how, so that a reader can judge the cases rather than take them on trust.

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED

// A COMPOSITE, NOT A CLIENT

No case is a real borrower. Each one is assembled from patterns seen across sixteen years of commercial banking practice, in Beijing and Auckland, and then built as a business that could exist: a sector, a size, a request, and three years of numbers. The names are invented — drawn from New Zealand's geography and flora — and every new one is checked against the New Zealand Companies Register before it is used, so that no case shares a name with a company that trades.

The bank in the cases is never named, and the people in them keep their descriptions rather than acquiring names: the founder-MD, the relationship manager, the accountant. That is a rule, not an omission. No case represents the policy, practice, or position of any institution.

// ONE WORLD, WHERE DECISIONS STAY IN FORCE

The cases are set in one continuing world, the Highbank Universe. A borrower that came to the desk in one issue can come back in a later one, and what the bank decided the first time is still in force. That continuity is kept in a register — every published case's borrower, request and outcome — so a later issue cannot quietly contradict an earlier one. The register holds published cases only; nothing on the site runs ahead of what a reader has been able to read.

// NUMBERS THAT HAVE TO RECONCILE

A case's figures are built to hang together: revenue, margin, working-capital days and cash flow derive from one another, and a facility is sized from the cycle it funds. Before an issue is published its numbers are re-derived from the case's own inputs, and the figures a page prints are checked against the register they come from, so that a number changed in one place and not the other fails before it is published rather than after.

// ONE BANKER'S READ, SIGNED AND DATED

The reading on each case is one senior banker's judgment — not a committee's, and not a consensus. It is signed, and every case carries the date it was published and the date its text last changed. Before publication each case is read adversarially: against its own numbers, against the register, and against the question of whether a reader with the file in front of them could reach the read from what the page shows.

// WHAT THE VOTE BARS SHOW

After you answer a case, the page shows how readers have answered it. That distribution is real or absent: until at least thirty readers have answered an issue, the page says so instead of drawing a bar. No page on this site carries a star rating or a reader count. The endorsements quoted on this site are of the book, by named practitioners, and were given in writing.

// CORRECTIONS

If a figure, a name or a reading is wrong, write to hello@bankingjudgmentlab.com. A correction is made on the page itself and moves the page's last-updated date, which is printed on every case and on this page. A composite case is not corrected to match any real business, because none describes one.

// WHAT THE SITE DOES NOT PUBLISH

The site publishes what the book names — the frameworks, their parts, and the ruling each one turns on — and not what the book teaches. Where a framework breaks, and what a senior banker does when it does, stay in How Bankers Think. The site does not name the author's employers, past or present; what it offers instead is a signed read on every case, the book, and the record of the cases themselves.

ABOUT THE LAB →·PRIVACY →