Invoice Finance
Funding a living ledger, not a loan — which is why the desk underwrites the debtors, the discipline, and the churn.
// 01 — THE PROBLEM IT SOLVES
A business selling on credit terms carries its customers permanently: at any moment, weeks of completed work sits on the ledger as unpaid invoices, and the faster sales grow, the more cash the ledger swallows. When the debtors are many and the invoices continuous, no single-transaction product fits — a trade loan wants one identifiable trade, and a fixed limit ignores that the need scales with sales. Invoice finance funds the ledger itself: an advance rate against eligible receivables, availability that rises as invoices are raised and repays as they collect.
The product's essence is that the collateral is a population, not a thing. Hundreds of small debts, constantly born and constantly dying, owed by parties the financier never chose. Everything distinctive about the product — the eligibility rules, the concentration caps, the audits, the reserves — is machinery for lending against a crowd, and the desk's reading runs less on the client's profit line than on the quality and honesty of the ledger.
// 02 — ANATOMY
The advance rate — commonly around 70-90% of eligible receivables, with the margin held back as the cushion against disputes, credit notes, and shortfalls. Eligibility rules — the quiet heart of the product: age cutoffs, related-party exclusions, dispute and set-off carve-outs, and a per-debtor concentration cap, so that the funded pool remains a genuine spread of arm's-length debts. The availability calculation — eligible pool times advance rate minus funds in use, recomputed continuously from the ledger data the client uploads.
Then the structural fork: factoring, where debtors are notified and pay the financier, who runs collections; or confidential invoice discounting, where the client keeps collecting in its own name and the financier's control is replaced by audits and verification. Around both: recourse (unpaid invoices recycle back to the client after a set period, unless credit insurance is wrapped in), a trust or collection account for receipts, and fees in two parts — a service fee on turnover and interest on funds in use.
// 03 — WHAT IT REALLY COSTS
Two modest-looking components that must be added and re-expressed before comparing with anything else. A constructed illustration, every figure invented for teaching:
Service fee 0.5% of turnover = NZ$30,000
Interest ~9% on funds in use ≈ NZ$45,000
All-in ≈ NZ$75,000 on NZ$500k average employed ≈ 15% effective
Neither headline number says fifteen percent, and the honest comparison starts from it. That effective cost is not automatically a verdict against the product — the funding genuinely scales with sales, needs no fixed asset security, and can be the only structure that fits a fast-growing book — but it is the number to weigh against a revolving facility where one is available, and against the margin the business actually earns on the sales being financed. Funding growth is only worth it when the growth is worth funding.
// 04 — HOW THE DESK READS IT
The ledger is the borrower. The desk underwrites the receivables population: how it ages, who it concentrates in, and — the number non-specialists miss — dilution: the percentage of invoiced value that never converts to cash because of credit notes, rebates, disputes, and adjustments. Dilution history sets the honest advance rate; a book that quietly dilutes at eight percent cannot safely support a ninety percent advance, whatever the aging looks like.
Concentration is the shape-shifter. A ledger where one debtor is half the book is not really invoice finance — it is single-name exposure wearing a spread product's clothes, and it should be read the way Issue 05 reads customer concentration: the risk is the asymmetry of commitment, not the paperwork. The caps exist to force that conversation early. Verification is the fraud control. The oldest failure in this product is fresh-air invoicing — funding raised against invoices for work not done or debts that do not exist — and the defences are unglamorous: debtor confirmations, cash-matching, audits, and attention when invoice patterns change shape.
And the availability spiral. The product's structural echo of the revolver's adverse selection: when a client weakens, their debtors slow, aging worsens, more of the book falls out of eligibility — and availability contracts exactly when the client needs it most. It is nobody's bad faith; it is the mechanism. A desk sizing a facility, and a CFO relying on one, should both know where the availability goes in a bad quarter before the bad quarter demonstrates it.
// 05 — WHERE IT GOES WRONG
Dilution discovered late. The advance rate was set off gross aging, the credit notes ran at eight percent, and the cushion everyone relied on was never really there. The dilution study belongs at the start, not in the workout.
The concentration surprise. The client wins a huge customer, the ledger doubles, and availability barely moves — the new name blew through the per-debtor cap. The cap was doing its job; the surprise means nobody explained the product's geometry when the facility was sold.
Confidential trust without the discipline. Invoice discounting granted on relationship optimism to a business whose ledger administration cannot carry it — collections drift, receipts stray from the trust account, and the financier is the last to know. The disclosed product exists precisely for books that are not ready.
The masked deterioration. Because funding scales with invoicing, a business can keep drawing cash while its debtors quietly stop paying — growth in the facility masking decay in the book, until eligibility rules catch up all at once. The early tell is on the debtor-days line, read against the ledger rather than the ledger's funding.
// 06 — WORKED ON THIS SITE
The boundary with single-transaction lending is drawn on the trade loan file — identifiable single trades there, the continuous ledger here — and stacking one product to do the other's job is a failure mode both pages name. Issue 05 works the concentration judgment this product's caps exist to force. Debtor days and their drift — the vital sign under every ledger — are worked in the cash conversion cycle example, and the borrower's-side reading in How Banks Read You.
// QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK
- What is invoice finance?
- Funding advanced against a business's whole ledger of unpaid invoices rather than against any single one. The financier advances a percentage of eligible receivables — commonly somewhere around 70 to 90 percent — and the availability moves with the ledger: raise more invoices and funding grows, collect them and the advance repays. It suits businesses whose cash is permanently trapped in debtor terms across many customers. The machinery underneath — eligibility rules, concentration limits, dilution reserves — exists because the collateral is a living, churning population of small debts rather than one inspectable transaction.
- What is the difference between factoring and invoice discounting?
- Who collects, and who knows. Under factoring, the financier takes over the sales ledger: debtors are notified, pay the financier directly, and collections become the financier's process — visible to customers, heavier in service, common for smaller businesses. Under invoice discounting, the arrangement is confidential: the business keeps collecting its own ledger and customers never know, which preserves the client relationship but means the financier is trusting the client's own collection conduct and bookkeeping. Confidential discounting is therefore usually reserved for larger businesses with demonstrably strong ledger administration.
- How much does invoice finance actually cost?
- Two components that must be added before comparing with anything else: a service or management fee, typically charged as a small percentage of invoice turnover, and interest on funds actually in use. Each looks modest alone; combined and expressed against the average funds employed, the effective rate is often well above what either headline suggests — a facility charging under one percent of turnover plus a single-digit interest rate can still work out to a mid-teens effective cost on the money actually used. That is not automatically bad — the funding genuinely scales with sales — but it is the honest number to decide with, and reputable financiers will walk through it.
- Will my customers know I am using invoice finance?
- Under factoring, yes — notification is how the product works, since debtors must pay the financier. Under confidential invoice discounting, no — invoices, statements, and collections all continue in the business's own name. The choice is partly about perception, but a desk reads it as a control decision: notification and direct payment give the financier certainty that cash arrives where it should, while confidentiality trades that certainty for the client's relationship preferences and is priced and policed accordingly, with audits and verification filling the visibility gap.
- What makes an invoice ineligible for funding?
- Anything that weakens the invoice as a debt. Common exclusions: invoices past a maximum age, typically around ninety days, since staleness predicts dispute or distress; related-party invoices, which are not arm's-length debts; amounts over a single-debtor concentration cap, so the book stays a book rather than one large exposure in disguise; invoices subject to dispute, retentions, or contractual set-off; pre-invoiced or milestone amounts where the work is not yet complete; and debtors in excluded jurisdictions. The eligible pool — not the gross ledger — is what the advance rate applies to, which is why two businesses with identical ledgers can have very different availability.
// SEE THE CONCENTRATION CALL
The judgment under this product's concentration caps is worked in full in Issue 05: one customer grown to 58% of revenue, and a request that funds assets dedicated to them. Make the call, then read the senior banker's.
Work Issue 05 →