Skip to content
// WORKED EXAMPLEHOW THE CLAUSE WORKS

Covenant Mulligan: How a Second Chance Is Drafted

The first miss is free. The drafting decides which miss is not.

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED

// THE SHORT ANSWER

A covenant mulligan is a lender's agreement to give up its first chance to act on a failed financial covenant test, and the drafting decides how much more than that it gives up. The name comes from golf, where a mulligan is a free retake of a bad shot. The borrower can fail once without being in default; the default arrives only with a later failure. Whether that failure must be the very next test, whether a pass in between restarts the count, and how soon the right returns are what separate a breathing space from a covenant that rarely bites.

BASIS  Practitioner judgment from sixteen years in commercial banking, set out in How Bankers Think (Highbank Press, 2026). Every borrower on this site is a composite constructed for teaching, not a client. The market is mid-market commercial lending as practised in New Zealand and Australia; where a convention differs elsewhere, the page says so.

// MAKE THE CALL

Issue 04 — Highview Industries. Same request as Issue 01 on the surface. A completely different file underneath. Your call first, then the senior banker's.

Read the file →

// 01 — WHY A BORROWER ASKS FOR ONE

A financial covenant breach, once certified, hands the lender a choice it did not have the day before: waive, reprice, reset or act. For a business with lumpy earnings, a single quarter can fail for reasons that reverse by the next one, and the owners would rather not pay a waiver fee, or put in an equity cure, to cover a dip that will correct itself. A mulligan removes the first breach from the list of events of default and leaves the covenant in place for the next test.

Where it appears it is negotiated, and it is met more often in larger corporate facilities than in leveraged ones: a 2018 law-firm review of European leveraged deals called it rare there. In mid-market bank lending in New Zealand, Australia and the UK the usual position is that a failed financial covenant is an event of default from the first test, subject to any cure right the agreement gives.

// 02 — HOW THE CLAUSE IS WRITTEN

Four drafting points do the work. The first is which later breach counts. The published descriptions and filed clauses require a failure at the next test, so a pass in between starts the count again; a looser draft could make any later failure the default. The second is reuse: a clause can say a further mulligan is not available until the covenant has been met for a set number of periods after the last one. The third is what the first breach still triggers. A lender can agree that it is not an event of default and still require something for it, such as more frequent reporting, access to management, or the borrower paying for the lender's advisers. The fourth is the interaction with an equity cure: where both exist, the second failure may become a default only once the cure window has closed without new money.

The wording around the word 'default' matters too. Many agreements use a wider defined term, such as a Default, that includes events which would become events of default with time or notice, and that term can stop new drawings or dividends. A lender reading a mulligan checks whether the disregarded breach is kept out of that wider term as well.

// 03 — THE EXAMPLE

A sponsor-backed veterinary clinic group, constructed for this page, has a net leverage covenant of 5.00 times tested quarterly. The level is the example's. Over five quarters its results are:

Mar 4.70× pass Jun 5.20× fail Sep 4.90× pass Dec 5.30× fail Mar 5.45× fail

The same five results produce four different default dates, depending on the clause:

No mulligan: event of default at June
Mulligan, any second failure counts: June disregarded → default at December
Mulligan, consecutive failures, reuse
only after two compliant periods: June disregarded; one pass in September
is not enough → default at December
Mulligan, consecutive failures, no limit: June disregarded; September resets the count;
December disregarded → default at March

Under the last draft the lender has watched the group fail three of four tests before it can act, and the business has spent nine months moving away from its covenant. Under the reuse-limited draft it can act a quarter sooner, at December. If the first breach also triggered monthly reporting and adviser access, the lender spent those quarters better informed even without a default to act on.

DEFINED IN ONE PARAGRAPH → · THE TEST DATE → · BANK LOAN VS PRIVATE CREDIT →

// 04 — THE CURES IT IS CONFUSED WITH

An equity cure and a mulligan both stop a breach becoming a default, but the equity cure is bought: the owners inject money and the ratio is recalculated as if it had been there. Under a mulligan the ratio stays failed and nobody pays.

A deemed cure works the other way round from a mulligan. Under a deemed cure the first breach is a default from the day it is certified, and the lender can act on it; the default lapses if the borrower passes the next test before the lender has done so. Under a mulligan the lender has nothing to act on until the later failure. In the example, a deemed cure would have given the lender a default in June that lapsed when September passed, and another in December that stood. Because a deemed-cure default expires with the next pass, a syndicate that wants to use it has to decide before that test.

Neither should be confused with a cure period, which only gives the borrower days to remedy a breach that can be remedied.

// 05 — WHERE IT DECIDES A FILE

The mulligan is decided in the term sheet, usually alongside the covenant level itself, and the two trade against each other: a lender may accept a mulligan in exchange for a tighter level, since a test that cannot bite at the first failure needs less room. Once signed, it changes what a breach means in the credit file. A first failure under a mulligan is not a default, but it is a fact, and the lender's internal grading and watchlist decisions do not have to wait for the contract to catch up. The credit officer records the breach, asks what the borrower expects at the next test, and reads the forecast knowing the next failure is the one that counts.

// QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK

Why is it called a covenant mulligan?
The word comes from golf, where a mulligan is an informal free retake of a bad shot. In a loan it describes the same idea: the borrower's first failed financial covenant test is disregarded as a default, and the borrower gets another chance at the next test or tests. Lawyers and lenders use the word informally, and some agreements adopt it as a defined term.
Is a covenant mulligan the same as a deemed cure?
No. Under a deemed cure the first breach is an event of default straight away, and it lapses only if the borrower passes the next test before the lender has acted on it. Under a mulligan there is no default to act on after the first breach. The difference is who carries the burden in the interval: under a deemed cure the lender must move quickly to keep its rights; under a mulligan it has none until the later failure.
How often can a covenant mulligan be used?
As often as the agreement allows, which is negotiated. Some clauses allow it only once over the life of the loan; some let it be used again once the borrower has passed the covenant for a set number of periods after the last use; some limit it to particular years, such as the period after a restructuring when earnings are expected to be volatile. A clause with no reuse limit and a consecutive-failure test can let a borrower fail most of its tests without a default.
Does a covenant mulligan stop a lender from doing anything after the first breach?
It stops the lender treating the breach as an event of default, so it cannot accelerate or enforce on that ground. It does not stop the lender using whatever else the agreement gives it: some mulligan clauses attach conditions to the first breach, such as more reporting or paying for the lender's advisers. Whether the breach still blocks new drawings or dividends depends on how the agreement defines a default.

THE IN-TRAY · ONE MINUTE

Make the call on one file.

A short file on the ground this page covers. Every option opens with how far it sits from a senior banker’s read.

THE FIRST QUESTION · THE LOAN · PROTECTION

A wholesaler's stock is the bank's main security. Its main supplier's terms say goods remain the supplier's property until they are paid for.

What does that clause do to the bank's security?

1 FILES · PICK A CALL ON ANY OF THEM

7 MORE ON THE LOAN · PROTECTION →WHERE DO YOU READ FROM? THE PLACEMENT →