An irrigation equipment maker, constructed for this page, wins a US$5.6m contract to supply and commission centre pivots for a state agricultural agency in a country whose rules accept only guarantees from locally licensed banks. The contract requires an advance payment guarantee of 15% and a performance guarantee of 7.5%. The exporter's bank issues two counter-guarantees to its correspondent there, each expiring 30 days after the local guarantee it supports, and the correspondent issues the local guarantees in the agency's own form. The percentages and periods are the example's.
Counter-guarantee, advance payment (15%) 840,000
Counter-guarantee, performance (7.5%) 420,000
Exporter's bank exposure at issue 1,260,000
Fees: the exporter's bank's, plus the correspondent's, passed through
Commissioning slips when a shipment is held at the port. Two weeks before the performance guarantee expires, the agency presents an extend-or-pay demand to the local bank, which suspends payment and passes the request down the chain with its own demand. The exporter agrees to a six-month extension, and both guarantees are extended: the local one by the correspondent, the counter-guarantee by the exporter's bank, which approves six more months of exposure to a project that is now late. With the extension granted, the agency's demand counts as withdrawn. Had none been granted, no further demand would have been needed: the exporter's bank, whose suspension ends at least four days before the local bank's, would have paid the correspondent's demand for US$420,000 and debited its customer, and the correspondent would then have paid the agency.