Skip to content
// WORKED EXAMPLETHE ARITHMETIC A DECISION RESTS ON

Debt Sculpting: a Worked Example

Repay most when the project earns most, and every year runs equally tight.

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED

// THE SHORT ANSWER

Debt sculpting is how a project lender writes a repayment schedule that follows the project's forecast cash instead of a straight line. Each period's interest and principal together are set to the cash forecast for that period divided by a chosen cover ratio, so every period is forecast to clear the same cover. The loan is then the present value of those payments at the loan's own interest rate. Sculpting lets a project with uneven cash borrow more than a level schedule would allow, but it spreads the lender's margin for error evenly: a weak year is planned with no more room than a strong one.

BASIS  Practitioner judgment from sixteen years in commercial banking, set out in How Bankers Think (Highbank Press, 2026). Every borrower on this site is a composite constructed for teaching, not a client. The market is mid-market commercial lending as practised in New Zealand and Australia; where a convention differs elsewhere, the page says so.

// MAKE THE CALL

Issue 11 — The Term Sheet War. A nine-year client brings a competitor's term sheet: 40 basis points inside your pricing, covenant-lite, and a Friday deadline. Your call first, then the senior banker's.

Read the file →

// 01 — WHY A PROJECT LENDER SHAPES THE REPAYMENTS

A project's cash flow is rarely flat. A wind farm earns more in windy years, a landfill gas plant's output falls as the site ages, a hydro scheme stops for a turbine overhaul, a contract steps its price up at set dates. A level repayment schedule ignores all of that. It asks for the same instalment in the overhaul year as in the best year, so the loan has to be sized to the weakest period, and the strong periods carry cover the lender did not need.

Sculpting turns the question round. Instead of fixing the instalment and testing the cover, the lender fixes the cover and derives the instalment. The schedule is solved once, at financial close, from the forecast the lenders have accepted, and it is then written into the facility agreement as the repayment profile.

// 02 — HOW THE SCHEDULE IS SOLVED

Debt service in period t = CFADS in t ÷ target DSCR
Principal in period t = debt service in t − interest on the opening balance
Loan size = Σ debt service in t ÷ (1 + r)^t
r = the loan's interest rate per period

CFADS, cash flow available for debt service, is the forecast cash left after operating costs, tax and maintenance spending. Dividing it by the target debt service cover ratio gives the most each period can pay. Because each period's interest is charged on whatever is still owed, the payments are fixed first and the loan is found from them: its size is the present value of the permitted payments, and each period's principal is what its payment leaves after interest. Where tax depends on the interest deducted, the calculation becomes circular, and models solve it by iteration.

Sculpting decides the shape; sizing decides the amount, and the amount is often the lower of more than one limit. A lender may also cap debt at a share of the project's cost, so the sculpted figure is a ceiling, not a promise. Nor need the target be one number: a schedule can be sculpted to a higher target in years when revenue is uncontracted. And the forecast it is sculpted to is itself a credit choice, a base case or a cautious one.

// 03 — THE EXAMPLE

A run-of-river hydro scheme, constructed for this page like every figure in it, is forecast to generate CFADS of US$6.0m, 6.4m, 4.0m, 6.8m and 7.2m over a five-year loan; year 3 carries a turbine overhaul. The lenders sculpt to a target cover of 1.30 times at an interest rate of 6.5%. A real project loan runs longer; the table is cut to five years so it can be read, and neither the target nor the rate is a market norm.

Year CFADS Debt service Interest Principal Cover
1 6.0 4.62 1.26 3.36 1.30×
2 6.4 4.92 1.04 3.88 1.30×
3 4.0 3.08 0.79 2.29 1.30×
4 6.8 5.23 0.64 4.59 1.30×
5 7.2 5.54 0.34 5.20 1.30×
Loan size = PV of debt service at 6.5% = 19.33 (figures rounded)

Set the same US$19.33m on level instalments and the overhaul year fails. Size a level schedule so that the overhaul year clears the target, and the loan shrinks by about a third:

Level instalments on 19.33 at 6.5%: 4.65 a year
cover by year: 1.29× 1.38× 0.86× 1.46× 1.55×
Level instalments sized to year 3: 4.0 ÷ 1.30 = 3.077 a year
loan: 3.077 × 4.156 (5-year annuity factor at 6.5%) = 12.79

Sculpting lets the scheme borrow US$19.33m against the same forecast that supports US$12.79m on a level schedule, about half as much again. The price is visible the moment the forecast slips. If year 4 produces 10% less than expected, US$6.12m:

Sculpted loan: 6.12 ÷ 5.23 = 1.17×
Level, sized to year 3: 6.12 ÷ 3.08 = 1.99×

The level loan has a year of strong cover to absorb the miss. The sculpted loan has the same thin cushion in year 4 as in year 3, and the miss shows in full in the ratio.

// 04 — HOW IT DIFFERS FROM THE LOAN LIFE COVER RATIO

A sculpted loan and the loan life cover ratio are built from the same present value, and at financial close they agree: where every period is sculpted to one target and the cash is discounted at the loan's rate, the LLCR at close equals that target. In the example it is 1.30 times. They separate afterwards. The schedule is fixed, while the LLCR is recalculated on each new forecast, so a weaker outlook for later years shows up in the LLCR before it reaches any single year's cover.

Sculpting also differs from the two straight-line profiles. Level instalments, as in a home loan, hold the payment constant and let cover rise and fall with the cash. Equal principal repayments front-load the payments, because interest is highest early. Sculpting holds the cover constant and lets the payment move.

DEFINED IN ONE PARAGRAPH → · CFADS, WORKED → · LOAN LIFE COVER RATIO →

// 05 — WHERE IT DECIDES A FILE

Because a sculpted loan plans no period with spare cover, the protection has to come from elsewhere. The target ratio is argued first, since it sets the loan's size. Then the forecast: whose case, how cautious, and whether the overhaul or the contract step-down is in the right year. Then the defences around the schedule. A debt service reserve account holds cash against a weak period, and when it is sized to the next instalments it moves with the sculpted profile. A distribution lock-up, often set below the target, stops cash leaving for the owners once cover thins.

The lender also reads the end of the schedule. Sculpting tends to push principal toward the years with the most cash, which are often the later ones, so the tail between final maturity and the end of the contracts decides how much room is left if those years disappoint.

DEBT SERVICE COVER → · AMORTISATION, DEFINED →

// QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK

What is the difference between debt sculpting and debt sizing?
Sculpting sets the shape of the repayment schedule: how much is repaid in each period, given the cash forecast for that period and a target cover ratio. Sizing sets how much can be borrowed in total, so that the sculpted payments repay the loan by its final maturity. In practice they are solved together: the permitted payments are discounted to find the size, and any other limit, such as a cap on debt as a share of cost, can then cut it.
Can a sculpted repayment schedule change after financial close?
Not by itself. The schedule is solved at close from the agreed forecast and written into the facility agreement, so later results change the cover, not the payments. If the project does better, the extra cash goes to the owners once the lock-up tests are met or, where the agreement has a cash sweep, to early repayment. If it does worse, a reserve account bridges the gap first; a lasting change needs an amendment agreed with the lenders or a refinancing, which may re-sculpt what is left.
Does debt sculpting make a project loan riskier?
It changes where the risk sits rather than adding to it in a simple way. A sculpted loan supports more debt from uneven cash, and every period carries the same target cover, so no year holds a surplus to absorb another's shortfall. A level loan sized to the weakest period borrows less and has more room in the strong years. Lenders weigh that through the target ratio, the forecast case and the reserves.
Is the LLCR equal to the DSCR in a sculpted loan?
At financial close, if every period is sculpted to the same target and the cash is discounted at the loan's interest rate, the loan life cover ratio equals that target. The two diverge after close: the repayment schedule is fixed, while each period's cover and the LLCR are recalculated on actual results and new forecasts. Reserve balances credited in the LLCR, or a different discount rate, also separate them.

THE IN-TRAY · ONE MINUTE

Make the call on one file.

A short file on the ground this page covers. Every option opens with how far it sits from a senior banker’s read.

THE CALL · THE LOAN · CAPACITY

A US$35m loan was sized on EBITDA of US$10m. Halfway through the year, management cuts its forecast to US$7m.

What changes?

1 FILES · PICK A CALL ON ANY OF THEM

5 MORE ON THE LOAN · CAPACITY →WHERE DO YOU READ FROM? THE PLACEMENT →