Fernbrook Foodservice Ltd, the head of the table: The room is quiet. What do you do?

// DRILLS / ISSUE 10 / FERNBROOK · HEAD OF THE TABLE

ISSUE 10 · 2026-10-06 · 5 MIN READTHE SENIOR READ — MICHAEL

// ONE FILE, THREE CHAIRS

// THE LENDING CHAIR · ISSUE 10

The Dissent

Read from this chair →

// THE HEAD OF THE TABLE

Straightforward

You are here

// THE PRESENTER'S CHAIR

Appendix Four

Read from this chair →

Straightforward

FERNBROOK FOODSERVICE, FROM THE HEAD OF THE TABLE

INSIDE THE BANK · THE HEAD OF THE TABLE · DIFFICULTY 3/5

// THE SETUP

You chair the credit committee: five members, majority rules. The first paper today recommends a US$3.5m expansion revolver for Fernbrook Foodservice, a wholesale distributor supplying cafés and restaurants across two islands — a growth story and a long relationship, presented by one of the best relationship managers in the building, eighteen years in.

You read the summary on the way in, and you opened the meeting the way you often do when a file looks clean: “This one looks straightforward.” The RM has now finished. The agenda is running forty minutes late, with papers still to come and a client of his waiting by the phone for tonight's answer.

Nobody has spoken. Two of the members are nodding. Down the table, the newest member — the third vote of five, the most junior person in the room — has the paper open near the back, has not looked up, and has not said a word.

The room is quiet, and it is waiting for you. What do you do?

// FY25 SNAPSHOT

SOURCE: THE PAPER AS TABLED · THE ROOM · COMPOSITE CASE — FICTIONAL

FACILITY ASK

US$3.5m

expansion revolver

MEMBERS

majority rules

WHO HAS SPOKEN

the presenter, and you

NEW-REGION REVENUE

31%

ships with return rights

AGENDA

+40 min

▼ running late

A common committee discipline has the chair give a view last and the most junior member speak first, so that rank does not decide what gets said. Minutes record the dissent that was voiced. They cannot record the question nobody asked.

// YOUR JUDGMENT

The room is quiet. What do you do?

[A]Call the vote — the paper is thorough, the presenter has earned the room's trust, and silence after a full presentation is an answer[B]Take back your opening, then ask every member for one question before any vote, starting with the most junior person at the table[C]Ask the presenter whether anything in the paper has changed since it was sent round, and if nothing has, move straight to the vote[D]Defer the paper to next week's meeting, when the agenda is lighter and a facility this size can be given the time it deserves

This drill needs JavaScript: the options above cannot be selected without it, and the senior banker's reading stays hidden. Turn JavaScript on and reload the page to take the drill.

// THE READING

Start with your own first sentence, because the room already has. A chair does not have one vote in five. The person with the most authority at the table casts a vote the moment they give a view, and every member who speaks after it hears it first. “This one looks straightforward” was a kind remark about a colleague's paper. It was also the first vote, cast before anyone had spoken — and in a room with rank in it, the person least likely to contradict it is the most junior one, who is also, often enough, the one who read the appendices last night.

That is what is wrong with A. A quiet room after the chair has blessed a paper is not agreement; it is deference, and it will look like agreement in the minutes. If there is something in the file, it arrives eight months from now as a facility drawn short, and nobody in this room will remember that they had it in their hands. C sounds diligent and asks the one person whose paper it is whether his paper is right — the question every presenter can answer honestly with “nothing has changed,” because nothing has. D spends a week of the client's time to buy the committee a calmer afternoon, and tells the RM his paper failed without telling him why.

The senior banker at the head of the table chooses B, and does it in two sentences. “I spoke too soon at the start — I'd like to hear from everyone before we vote.” Then: “One question each, starting with you,” to the most junior member. Taking back an opening costs a chair a sentence. It is the only way to hand the room back after you have leaned on it, and starting from the least senior person reverses the order in which rank silences people. Ninety seconds, and the question that was sitting in the back of the paper is in the room.

In this room it is a question about the receivables — shown net of US$1.8m of customer advances in the body of the paper, gross in appendix four — and about return rights on the new regions' sales. Neither is fraud. Both change the size of the right facility, and both could have been voted through with nobody meaning any harm, because the chair had already said what the answer was. The job at the head of the table is not to have the best view in the room. It is to make sure the room's best view reaches the vote.

A chair who speaks first has voted for everyone. Take the sentence back, and ask the quietest person first.

// THE SAME FILE, FROM THE OTHER CHAIRS

Three people read this file in the same week, each from their own side of it. Only one of them holds the bank's lever.

// THE LENDING CHAIR · ISSUE 10

The Dissent

The paper recommends approval. You found the hole. You're the third vote of five — and the RM outranks you.

Read from this chair →

// THE PRESENTER'S CHAIR

Appendix Four

Your paper, your client by the phone, and a question from the most junior person in the room that your appendix answers and your summary does not.

Read from this chair →

// HOW READERS ANSWER

The senior banker's read is [B].

Early days. The distribution appears here once enough readers have answered.

The tempting answer is A. The senior banker chose B. The reading explains why a quiet room after the chair has spoken is not agreement, and what ninety seconds at the head of the table can buy.

← All drills Archive — every issue