A wholesaler of hair and beauty products to salons, constructed for this page like every figure in it, has credit sales of US$48m, 60-day terms, net debt of US$18m and EBITDA of US$6.0m. Its overdraft costs 9%. It offers 2.5% off for payment within 10 days, and 30% of sales take it up. Half of those takers were already prompt, paying at about day 25. The other half were paying at about day 70. Everyone else carries on at about day 68.
Sales Paid before Debtors released Discount Rate
Prompt payers 7.2 day 25 7.2 × 15 ÷ 365 = 0.30 0.18 61%
Slow payers 7.2 day 70 7.2 × 60 ÷ 365 = 1.18 0.18 15%
All takers 14.4 1.48 0.36 24%
Debtors before: (7.2 × 25 + 7.2 × 70 + 33.6 × 68) ÷ 365 = 8.13
Debtors after: (14.4 × 10 + 33.6 × 68) ÷ 365 = 6.65
Debtor days: 8.13 ÷ 48 × 365 = 62 6.65 ÷ 48 × 365 = 51
Overdraft interest saved: 1.48 × 9% = 0.13
Extra cost a year: 0.36 − 0.13 = 0.23
Leverage: 18.0 ÷ 6.0 = 3.00× (18.0 − 1.48 + 0.36) ÷ 5.64 = 2.99×
If the ledger funds an 80% advance:
Borrowing capacity lost: 1.48 × 80% = 1.18
Cash left after repaying: 1.48 − 1.18 = 0.30
The rates are measured on the debtors released, before rounding, which is why the 15% and 61% differ slightly from the formula. The headline said 19%; the offer costs 24%, because half the discount went to customers who needed little persuading. Debtor days improved by 11, which looks like better collection and was purchased. Leverage hardly moved, since the fall in EBITDA ate the fall in debt. The last two lines show the most important result for a borrower on invoice finance: the discount reduces the ledger the financier advances against, so the US$1.48m of cash released repays US$1.18m of funding and leaves US$0.30m once, less than the US$0.36m the discount costs every year. The example treats the whole ledger as eligible and is the page's, not a market norm.