Skip to content
// WORKED EXAMPLETHE ARITHMETIC A DECISION RESTS ON

Exposure at Default: a Worked Example

The balance today is not the balance on the day it goes wrong.

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED · 5 MIN READ

// THE SHORT ANSWER

The balance on a lender's screen today is seldom the balance on the day a borrower stops paying, because a business heading for trouble uses every line it has been promised. Exposure at default estimates that later figure. A lawnmower distributor with US$7.5m drawn and US$3.9m of unused limit and bonds has an exposure of US$9.1m on Basel's standard factors and US$10.35m on the bank's own experience. The extra amount is why an empty line carries risk, and why cutting a limit the business does not need reduces exposure without touching a dollar of the drawn debt.

BASIS  Practitioner judgment from sixteen years in commercial banking, set out in How Bankers Think (Highbank Press, 2026). Every borrower on this site is a composite constructed for teaching, not a client. The market is mid-market commercial lending as practised in New Zealand and Australia; where a convention differs elsewhere, the page says so.

// MAKE THE CALL

Issue 09 — The Tuesday List. Eight dashboards. Two intensive-care slots. Portfolio triage, Tuesday 8:30am. Your call first, then the senior banker's.

Read the file →

PART OF When Your Loan Goes to the Workout Team

// 01 — WHY THE DRAWN BALANCE IS THE WRONG NUMBER

A term loan is simple: what is owed is the balance, plus accrued interest and fees. A revolving line is different, because the borrower decides how much of it to use and the decision is correlated with distress. A healthy company might run its line at 30%. A company a few months from failure pays suppliers and wages from the same line until it is full. Guarantees and bonds behave in a related way: they use no cash until the customer fails to perform, which tends to happen in the same months.

Measuring only what is drawn would therefore understate the debt in the very cases where the lender most needs an accurate figure.

// 02 — HOW IT IS CALCULATED

EAD = drawn balance + (undrawn or contingent amount × conversion factor)
Expected loss = PD × LGD × EAD

The conversion factor is covered on its own page, with the Basel, Australian and UK tables. Under the Basel framework's foundation approach those are the same factors a standardised bank uses. Under the advanced approach, where a supervisor allows it, a bank may estimate its own EAD for undrawn revolving commitments, subject to a floor of the drawn amount plus 50% of the standardised off-balance-sheet figure. Its estimate must be a long-run default-weighted average and, where estimates swing with the cycle, appropriate to a downturn if that is more conservative. Everything else off the balance sheet stays on standardised factors.

Exposure is measured gross of specific provisions and partial write-offs. A derivative has its own counterparty exposure calculation. Under expected credit loss accounting, the estimate also has a time dimension: it follows the expected path of the balance, including scheduled repayments and likely drawings on commitments.

// 03 — THE EXAMPLE

A lawnmower distributor, constructed for this page like every figure in it, has a US$6.0m term loan, a US$5.0m committed revolver with US$1.5m drawn and a US$0.4m performance bond. The bank's own records show that borrowers on similar lines used about 70% of the unused amount before default. Amounts in US$m.

Amount Standard EAD Own EAD
factor experience
Term loan 6.00 100% 6.00 100% 6.00
Revolver, drawn 1.50 100% 1.50 100% 1.50
Revolver, undrawn 3.50 40% 1.40 70% 2.45
Performance bond 0.40 50% 0.20 100% 0.40
Total 11.40 9.10 10.35
Expected loss at PD 2.5% and LGD 45%:
on drawn balances only 7.50 → 84,375
on the standard factors 9.10 → 102,375
on own experience 10.35 → 116,438

The standard column uses the Basel factors of 40% for a commitment and 50% for a performance bond; the 70% is the example's, as are the PD and LGD. The right-hand column is a management view, and would not all be permitted as a capital input, since the bond would stay on its standard factor. Reading only the drawn balance understates the expected loss by more than a quarter against the bank's own experience.

Now suppose the distributor has not used more than US$3.5m of the revolver at any seasonal peak in five years, and at renewal the two sides agree a limit at that level.

Undrawn falls from 3.50 to 2.00
Standard EAD: 6.00 + 1.50 + (2.00 × 40%) + 0.20 = 8.50 (down 0.60)
Expected loss: 8.50 × 2.5% × 45% = 95,625 (down 6,750)

Nothing was repaid. The bank has reduced what it could lose, and the capital that goes with it, by no longer making a promise the business was not using.

// 04 — HOW IT DIFFERS FROM THE LIMIT AND THE BALANCE

EAD usually sits between the drawn balance and the limit: at a 40% factor nearer the drawn balance, and on a bank's own experience sometimes nearer the limit. For a bank on internal ratings it is not reduced by collateral; the foundation approach says EAD is calculated without taking collateral into account. Security goes to loss given default, which is why the two numbers stay apart. Where a bank estimates the exposure on a derivative line, the nearest idea is potential future exposure, which models how a contract's value could move.

DEFINED IN ONE PARAGRAPH → · CREDIT CONVERSION FACTOR, WORKED → · EXPECTED LOSS, WORKED →

// 05 — WHERE IT DECIDES A FILE

Limit size is a decision about EAD as much as about the business. A borrower asking for headroom it may not need is asking the bank to carry it, which is what the commitment fee pays for. A lender can shape the figure: the Basel foundation rules apply the factor to the lower of the unused line and any ceiling that constrains availability, such as one tied to reported cash flow, where the bank monitors it adequately. A borrowing base has that effect in practice.

The document does the rest. Conditions on each drawing, an uncommitted line and early warning from covenants all aim at the same moment, stopping the last drawings before they become the loss. Their value depends on the lender noticing in time.

CORPORATE LENDING AND CREDIT RISK → · RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS, WORKED →

// SOURCES

The documents the statements on this page rest on. Each was opened and checked when cited.

  1. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, The Basel Framework, CRE20, CRE32 and CRE36 — paragraphs 20.97, 20.98, 32.10, 32.29, 32.32 to 32.36 and 36.90 — The 50% and 40% factors, EAD calculated without regard to collateral, measurement gross of provisions, the foundation and advanced EAD routes, the lower-of rule for constrained lines, the EAD floor, and the long-run default-weighted and downturn requirement — sections 02 and 05.

// QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK

How is exposure at default calculated?
Add what is already drawn, including accrued interest and fees, to the part of any unused or contingent amount expected to become a claim. A term loan's exposure is its balance. A revolver's is the drawn balance plus the undrawn amount multiplied by a credit conversion factor, set by the capital rules or estimated by a bank allowed to use its own data. Guarantees and letters of credit are converted in the same way at their own factors.
Why does a borrower draw down before it defaults?
Because cash is what a failing business runs out of, and a committed line is one of the few sources left. Suppliers shorten terms, customers delay payment, and the treasurer draws what remains while the bank is still obliged to fund. Lenders try to catch this with conditions on each drawing and early covenant tests. Published capital rules assume some drawdown for that reason, and a bank's own default records usually show it clearly.
Does collateral reduce exposure at default?
Not for a bank on internal ratings, as a rule. Security affects how much is lost after default rather than how much is owed when it happens, so it goes into loss given default, and the Basel foundation approach calculates exposure without regard to collateral. A standardised bank's capital calculation can reduce the exposure amount for eligible financial collateral, and on-balance-sheet netting can lower it where the rules allow. The debt owed on the day of default is unchanged either way.
Is exposure at default the same as the credit limit?
No. The limit is the most the bank has promised; EAD is what it expects to be owed if the borrower fails. For a term loan, EAD is usually the balance, not the original limit. For a revolver, it normally sits below the limit, because the capital factor counts only part of the undrawn amount. A borrower can also exceed a limit by the time of default, through accrued interest or an unauthorised excess, so a limit is not a ceiling on the outcome.

// NEXT TO IT

// ON WHOSE DESK

The seats that read this term in an ordinary week. Each page says what the seat is for, who arrives in it, and the shape of the round it runs.

  • Credit risk analystSets and monitors the standard the lending line works to — policy, appetite, ratings and the models underneath them.
  • Portfolio managerOwns the credit on a book after the money is out — reviews, covenants, ratings and early warning.
  • Model validatorIndependently checks that the bank's models do what they claim, before anyone relies on them.

THE IN-TRAY · ONE MINUTE

Make the call on one file.

A short file on the ground this page covers. Every option opens with how far it sits from a senior banker’s read.

THE NUMBER · THE BANK · ASSET QUALITY

A bank's annual report gives three figures for its loan book.

Gross loans
US$10bn
Non-performing loans
US$300m
Provisions held
US$180m

What is its provision coverage of non-performing loans?

1 FILES · PICK A CALL ON ANY OF THEM

5 MORE ON THE BANK · ASSET QUALITY →WHERE DO YOU READ FROM? THE PLACEMENT →