Skip to content
FRAMEWORK 05 · CHAPTER 5A 2×2 · A THIRD DIMENSION · A MODIFIER

The Lendability Matrix.

What kind of debt can this industry support — and where does that read break?

ONE OF EIGHT · FROM HOW BANKERS THINK · FREE · NO SIGNUP

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED

// THE SHORT ANSWER

The Lendability Matrix, from Michael Shang's How Bankers Think, organises industries on two dimensions — asset intensity and cash flow stability — into four quadrants, each of which supports a different kind of lending. It does not tell a banker whether to lend; it tells them what shape of debt the industry can carry: term lending against assets, asset-based lending through a cash-flow cycle, cash-flow lending against contracted income, or lending with discipline where neither income nor collateral catches you. The matrix is the entry point. Cycle position and concentration are the refinements that stop it misleading, and the situations where it breaks are where senior judgment lives.

// THE PARTS

  1. 01High asset · stable cash flow — Term lending heaven — the quadrant commercial banks were built to lend into.
  2. 02High asset · volatile cash flow — Asset-based lending territory — lend against the asset and ride the cash-flow cycle.
  3. 03Low asset · stable cash flow — Cash-flow lending territory — lend against the contracted income, not the balance sheet.
  4. 04Low asset · volatile cash flow — The banker's caution zone — neither income nor collateral catches you. Lend with discipline, or not.
  5. 05Then: cycle position — The third dimension the matrix does not capture — how stable any quadrant placement actually is right now.
  6. 06Then: concentration — The within-quadrant modifier — customer, supplier and geographic concentration adjust lendability inside a quadrant.

// BASIS

Developed in chapter 5, Reading the Industry, Not Just the Borrower, of How Bankers Think: Inside Commercial Banking's Hidden Curriculum (Michael Shang, Highbank Press, 2026; paperback ISBN 978-1-0672833-0-8), from sixteen years in commercial banking. The definition and the parts above are the author's own, taken from the chapter that develops the framework rather than from the book's appendix. It is a practitioner's framework, set out in print and tested on the case files this site publishes — not a regulatory standard, and not a convention borrowed from a textbook.

Adjacent to industry risk assessment in bank credit policy and to the standing distinction between asset-based and cash-flow lending; the matrix puts the two on one grid, so that the shape of debt an industry can carry follows from where it sits, and adds the two refinements — cycle position and concentration — that a grid alone omits.

FROM THE CHAPTER · PAGES 156–157
“The framework in Section 3 — the Lendability Matrix — is, in some sense, a compressed visualisation of two of these four questions, organised onto two axes that produce four quadrants. The matrix is useful as an entry point, and we will develop it carefully. It is also, importantly, only a starting point.”

Michael Shang, How Bankers Think (Highbank Press, 2026), chapter 5, pages 156–157 of the print edition.

// READ ALONGSIDE

The recognised ground this page sits beside. Each was opened and checked when cited; none is a source for the framework itself.

  1. APRA, Prudential Standard APS 220 Credit Risk Management, paragraphs 64–65 (in force from 1 January 2023) — A bank must monitor the condition of individual exposures and the overall composition and quality of its portfolio — the regulatory home of the matrix's concentration modifier.
  2. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Principles for the management of credit risk (BIS, April 2025) — Credit administration, measurement and monitoring as a supervisory expectation; industry and sector exposure is read there at portfolio level, where the matrix reads it at the desk.
  3. APRA, Prudential Practice Guide APG 220 Credit Risk Management (current from 1 January 2022), paragraphs 77–78 — Concentrations to borrowers with similar risk characteristics — the same industry, region, loan type or product — are named as a significant source of credit risk: the concentration modifier, in the regulator's words.

// WHERE IT SITS

Every framework in the book is a structured way of answering one question — “How do I get my money back, with interest, across cycles?” — through the three questions beneath it. This one serves:

  • QUESTION 01 · CREDIT
    Will I get paid back?
    Cash flows, assets, business model, resilience across cycles.
  • QUESTION 03 · EXIT
    Can I get out if I'm wrong?
    Covenants, secondary markets, alternative lenders, structural exits.

The framework is developed in chapter 5 of How Bankers Think, Reading the Industry, Not Just the Borrower. The short form is in the glossary; the architecture all eight hang from is on the frameworks page.

// WORKED IN

Where this site runs the framework on a file, free and without signup.

// A CASE, READ WITH IT

A composite file — every borrower on this site is constructed — summarised from the page it links to.

Issue 05 is the concentration modifier at work. A logistics business sits in a quadrant that would ordinarily carry term debt against the assets it wants to buy. Then the modifier: 58 per cent of revenue from one customer, on a contract with a 90-day break clause, and the assets to be financed are dedicated to that customer. The quadrant says the industry can carry the debt; the modifier says this borrower cannot, because the bank would be underwriting the customer's right to leave. The diversification covenant offered in mitigation is fiction — a promise about revenue the borrower does not control.

Issue 05 · Meridian Logistics →

// ON THE IN-TRAY

Six one-minute files on Chapter 5, each call read against a senior banker's. The Lendability Matrix on the In-Tray →

// THE OTHER SEVEN

  1. 01The Three Questions
  2. 02The Four Signals
  3. 03The Three Diagnostics
  4. 04Quality of Earnings Triangulation
  5. 06The Three Modes of Watching
  6. 07The Walk-Away Framework
  7. 08The Three Translations
THE FULL TREATMENT

This page is the working form. Chapter 5 is where the framework is developed — where it came from, where it breaks, what a senior banker does when it does, and the cases that turn it from checklist into instinct.

How Bankers Think — eight chapters →