Skip to content
// WORKED EXAMPLETHE ARITHMETIC A DECISION RESTS ON

Liquidation Value: a Worked Example

Price the business as if the lights have gone off.

BY MICHAEL SHANG · SIXTEEN YEARS IN COMMERCIAL BANKING · UPDATED

// THE SHORT ANSWER

Liquidation value answers the lender's least comfortable question: if this business closed tomorrow and its assets went to whoever would buy them, what cash would come back after the costs of selling? It is built asset by asset, because a closed business has no earnings to capitalise, and it is usually given in two versions that differ only in time: an orderly figure, with a normal marketing period, and a forced figure, with a short one. The gap between them is often wide, and it is the gap a lender's security has to survive.

BASIS  Practitioner judgment from sixteen years in commercial banking, set out in How Bankers Think (Highbank Press, 2026). Every borrower on this site is a composite constructed for teaching, not a client. The market is mid-market commercial lending as practised in New Zealand and Australia; where a convention differs elsewhere, the page says so.

// MAKE THE CALL

Issue 03 — Kauri Dairy Holdings. The patriarch is retiring. The bank hears about the succession plan from the accountant first. Your call first, then the senior banker's.

Read the file →

// 01 — WHY A LENDER PRICES THE CLOSED BUSINESS

A bank lends against cash flow and takes security for the day the cash flow stops. On that day the business is worth what its pieces fetch, not what its accounts say. Receivables become harder to collect once customers know the supplier is gone, work in progress has no buyer, and machinery sells for what a stranger will pay to dismantle and move it. Liquidation value is the lender's estimate of that day, and it is the floor under the second way out.

It is also the number creditors measure each other against. When a distressed company proposes a deal, one of the first questions creditors ask is whether it beats a liquidation. A lender that knows the liquidation figure knows what it can refuse.

// 02 — HOW THE FIGURE IS BUILT

Gross realisations = sum over each asset class of (book value × recovery)
Net liquidation value = gross realisations − costs of realisation
Left for the lender = net value − claims ranking ahead of it

Each asset class gets its own recovery, set by a valuer for plant and stock and by the lender's own reading for receivables. The moving parts are the same in every market. Time: the orderly premise allows a typical marketing period, the forced premise a shortened one, and the International Valuation Standards ask the valuer to state which was assumed. Place: plant valued where it stands, sold with the site to a buyer who keeps it running, is worth more than plant that must be removed, and on a leased site removal is often the assumption. Costs: agents' and auctioneers' commissions, removal, insurance and rent while the assets are held, and the fees of the receiver or liquidator who runs the sale.

The last step is what ranks ahead. In each of the three markets, certain employee entitlements are paid ahead of the secured lender out of particular assets: in New Zealand, accounts receivable and inventory, a priority some Inland Revenue claims share; in Australia, assets subject to a circulating security interest; in the UK, floating-charge assets, where some tax debts are also preferential. Where such claims exist, the lender's share of the receivables and stock is smaller than what those assets realise.

// 03 — THE EXAMPLE

A commercial signage manufacturer, constructed for this page like every figure in it, owes its bank US$6.3m: a US$4.5m term loan and US$1.8m drawn on its overdraft. The bank holds a general security agreement over the company. The factory is leased. The recovery rates below are this example's, set for this business, and are not offered as market norms. Figures in US$m.

Book Orderly Forced
Receivables 5.00 3.75 3.00
Stock 3.60 1.52 0.88
Plant and machinery 6.40 2.80 1.60
Gross realisations 15.00 8.07 5.48
Costs of realisation −1.07 −0.68
Net liquidation value 7.00 4.80
Employee claims ranking ahead −0.60 −0.60
Left for the bank 6.40 4.20
Bank debt 6.30 6.30
Surplus or (shortfall) 0.10 (2.10)

Stock and plant both lose more than half their book value even in the orderly case. A third of the stock is part-made signs for named customers, worth little to anyone else. The receivables lose a quarter even in the orderly case, because customers of a failed manufacturer dispute finish, hold back retentions and set off warranty claims. The plant is valued removed, because the landlord will want the building back.

The bank is covered if the sale has six months and short by US$2.1m if it has six weeks. Nothing in the business separates the two columns; only time does. A credit paper that quoted the book value of US$15m against debt of US$6.3m would have shown more than twice cover on assets that would not have covered the debt in a hurry.

// 04 — HOW IT DIFFERS FROM THE VALUES BESIDE IT

Forced-sale value is what one asset fetches when it has to be sold quickly by someone other than its owner, such as a building sold by a mortgagee or a machine sold by a receiver. Liquidation value prices everything a stopped business owns at once, and its forced version is the sum of many such sales less the cost of running them. Going-concern value is what a buyer would pay for the business still trading, earnings and customers included; when it is well above liquidation value, the lender has a reason to support a sale of the business rather than its pieces.

Lending value is the bank's own figure, the share of a security's value it is prepared to lend against. A lender may set it with liquidation value in mind, but the two answer different questions: what would come back, and how much the bank will advance before it is uncomfortable.

DEFINED IN ONE PARAGRAPH → · THE RECOVERY WATERFALL → · WHAT YOUR BANK HOLDS AS SECURITY →

// 05 — WHERE IT DECIDES A FILE

At approval, it sizes the risk the bank is taking if the business fails, and it is where a credit officer tests whether the security case holds at forced values rather than book. In a workout, it frames the choice between enforcing now and supporting the business while it trades: support is worth giving when the business alive is worth more to the bank than its parts, and the gap between the columns tells the lender how much a rushed sale would cost.

In a restructuring, it becomes the benchmark. In the UK, a court can sanction a restructuring plan over a dissenting class only if that class would be no worse off than in the relevant alternative, and the alternative is often an administration or liquidation. In Australia, an administrator must give creditors an opinion on whether a deed of company arrangement, ending the administration or winding up is in their interests, and reports commonly set out the estimated return in a liquidation beside the deed's. A proposal that pays less than the lender's liquidation figure starts from behind.

WHEN A LOAN GOES BAD → · CREDITOR COMPROMISE → · SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT →

// SOURCES

The documents the statements on this page rest on. Each was opened and checked when cited.

  1. International Valuation Standards Council, International Valuation Standards (effective 31 January 2028), Exposure Draft — IVS 102 Bases of Value, Appendix A60; IVS 300 Plant, Equipment and Infrastructure, paragraph 50.03 — Defines liquidation value under an orderly or a forced premise, requires the valuer to disclose which premise is assumed, and asks whether assets are valued in place or removed — section 02.
  2. Companies Act 2006 (UK), section 901G — sanction for compromise or arrangement where one or more classes dissent — Allows sanction over a dissenting class only if its members would be no worse off than in the relevant alternative, defined as what would most likely occur without the plan — section 05.
  3. Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 (Cth), section 75-225(3) — Requires the administrator's report for the decision meeting to state an opinion on whether executing a deed of company arrangement, ending the administration or winding up is in creditors' interests — section 05.

// QUESTIONS PEOPLE ASK

What is the difference between orderly and forced liquidation value?
Time. An orderly liquidation value assumes the assets are marketed for a normal period to buyers who can be found and allowed to compete; a forced liquidation value assumes a sale within a much shorter period, often by auction. Both assume the business has stopped and the seller must sell. The forced figure is lower, and the difference is largest for specialised plant and part-made stock, which few buyers want at short notice.
How is liquidation value calculated?
Asset class by asset class. Each class of asset, such as receivables, stock, plant and vehicles, is given a recovery reflecting what it would realise in a closed business; the recoveries are summed; the costs of selling, holding and running the sale are deducted. A lender then subtracts anything ranking ahead of its security, such as preferential employee claims on circulating assets, to reach what would come back to it. Plant and stock figures usually come from a valuer; the lender judges receivables itself.
What is net orderly liquidation value (NOLV)?
Net orderly liquidation value is the orderly liquidation figure after the costs of realisation have been deducted: commissions, removal, holding costs and the fees of whoever runs the sale. The term is most used in asset-based lending, where a lender may set the advance it allows against stock or plant as a share of the valuer's NOLV. Read the valuation report for what the costs cover, because two reports can mean different things by the same initials.
Why is liquidation value lower than book value?
Book value records what assets cost less depreciation, on the assumption that the business keeps using them. A closed business loses that assumption. Its customers pay less readily, part-made goods have no buyer, and plant is worth what someone else will pay to remove it. Costs of sale then come off the top. The difference is not an accounting error; it is the price of the business no longer being a business.

THE IN-TRAY · ONE MINUTE

Make the call on one file.

A short file on the ground this page covers. Every option opens with how far it sits from a senior banker’s read.

THE NUMBER · THE LOAN · PROTECTION

A company fails. One lender is secured over the plant; the other is unsecured. The receiver's realisations, after costs, are below. There are no preferential claims.

Secured lender owed
US$10m
Unsecured lender owed
US$5m
Realised from the plant
US$9m
Realised from everything else
US$2m

What does the unsecured lender recover?

1 FILES · PICK A CALL ON ANY OF THEM

7 MORE ON THE LOAN · PROTECTION →WHERE DO YOU READ FROM? THE PLACEMENT →