An automotive parts wholesaler, constructed for this page like every figure in it, holds stock of US$9.6m at cost against cost of sales of US$32m a year, and carries a stock provision of US$0.2m. Its stock ageing, by last sale date, and its lender's borrowing base rules, which belong to the example and are not a market norm, read as follows. In US$ millions:
Sold in the last 6 months 7.2 advanced at 50% = 3.60
No sale for 6–12 months 1.5 advanced at 25% = 0.38
No sale for over 12 months 0.9 excluded = 0.00
Total 9.6 3.98
If all stock were advanced at 50%: 9.6 × 50% = 4.80
The age test takes US$0.82m off what the stock would support at a flat rate. The lender then forms its own view of value. If the 6–12 month lines would sell at about 80% of cost and the older lines at about 40%, the shortfall below cost is larger than the provision held:
Shortfall: 1.5 × 20% + 0.9 × 60% = 0.30 + 0.54 = 0.84
Provision held = 0.20
Possible further write-down = 0.64
Inventory days, all stock: 9.6 ÷ 32 × 365 = 110
Inventory days, selling lines: 7.2 ÷ 32 × 365 = 82
The business reports 110 days of stock. The part that sells turns in about 82. The other 27 or so days' worth, US$2.4m, is the tail, and it is where the US$0.64m of earnings and equity the accounts may not yet show is sitting. A year earlier the two slow bands held US$1.1m, so the tail has more than doubled while the headline total barely moved.